PNGAA Library: Paul Quinlivan's Snapshots5. Stiffly starched white coats, and other differences |
|
The coats on all the men in the photo on the middle pages of the last Una Voce remind me of an essential difference between the early 50s and, say, the 60s. As did the sight, on TV recently, of an English judge asking for a red bonnet to wear because, he said, judicial robes were inappropriate for the trial he was conducting into Nazi War Crimes but he wanted people to know who he was. For my first six months in TPNG I did not realise just how entrenched the ‘white coats' mentality was because, apart from the first week (when people kindly lent me a coat to wear to Government House, etc.), I was constantly on circuit with Monte Phillips who always travelled in shorts and long sox because of his gammy knee. Since we always stayed in people's homes, there was no ‘dressing up' and, if luggage went astray, Monte would borrow a piece of red material and drape it over his shoulders to show that, whereas Kiaps were ‘judge' when on the Bench, he was ‘the judge who wore the red cloth'. It was not until June 1952 when Monte gave a luncheon party at his home for all the lawyers of the Territory, to discuss the formation of a Local Law Society, that I realised that slavery to white coats was total. By then, of course, I had had one made by a Rabaul tailor but Joe Lynch, who arrived the same day as I did, had to borrow one for the luncheon and he, together with lawyers who had flown in from Rabaul and Lae, were seated at a drop-side table. It was the finest meal I ever had in the Territory but it failed to overcome local jealousies because, during the very first course, Joe knocked the leg of the table and his side collapsed, covering him and Harold James (their white coats, to be precise) in vichyssoise soup. Since neither Joe nor Harold (from Rabaul) could get a replacement coat, Monte gave the order ‘Remove Coats' and the ironclad rule was broken. So was the spell which Monte had woven, at great personal expense, because although everyone paid due attention to his speech about ‘dangers ahead', they went away with something else to talk about. The rule about coats was, of course, not a great burden to carry but, some months later, I was asked to do the first Price Control prosecutions and I discovered that each Magistrates' court had a rack of discarded coats which Europeans who were suddenly called to give evidence had to put on to be ‘properly dressed'. Filthy and stiff with mildew, they added nothing to The Law and it was one of my earliest victories to have the compulsory straight-jacketing of witnesses abolished. On the credit side there were many attractions. The Territory was the safest place on earth for a white person (we shall see several illustrations of this), largely because we had protected land rights, interfered only where existing systems prevented people moving freely, and we never imposed corvée, the compulsory (semi-slave) labour traditional in other ‘colonial' countries. This non-interference meant that the cost, to Australia, of running the country had been minimal but it imposed special burdens on those working in the field, burdens which quickly sorted out the competent from the loud-mouth who owed his job to ‘friends back home'. It was not uncommon to find that the quiet unassuming man standing next to you was a hero who had done great deeds behind Japanese lines if you could only get him to talk. To illustrate this I would mention Ivan Champion who, on 9 April 1942, sailed Laurabada to Palmalmal, New Britain, and rescued 150 Australian troops from under the noses of the Japanese, bringing them safely back to Moresby. He told me, "Everyone with the right spirit can find this a very satisfying place."
|